Skip to main content
AMLOK’s research question is whether a shared representation of financial activity can support better underwriting and earlier, more reliable risk signals. The proposed system combines institution-provided evidence, borrower-permissioned banking and business-system data, and appropriately licensed public context. It covers business and consumer use cases through separate task definitions and validation cohorts.
Research specification and initial experiments - November 1, 2026. This release contains a literature review, proposed architecture and training protocol, a real public-data descriptive analysis, and an executed synthetic transformer study. It does not report a trained production foundation model, observed borrower outcomes, or completed comparisons against commercial or frontier models. Each result identifies its evidence class.

Abstract

Financial records describe different stages of the same economic activity. A sale can appear as an order, invoice, payment, settlement, bank deposit, and accounting entry. Combining those records without resolving their relationships overstates activity. Examining only bank deposits can hide margins, obligations, reversals, and changes that precede settlement. The proposed AMLOK architecture therefore separates transaction interpretation, economic-event reconciliation, temporal entity resolution, financial calculation, and outcome prediction. The core hypothesis is that this separation improves evidence quality and permits a shared representation to transfer across underwriting and monitoring. It remains a hypothesis until tested on authorized, representative Canadian cohorts. A secondary hypothesis is that a relatively compact specialist model can match or exceed a general-purpose language model on a tightly defined task at lower cost. Model size and technical novelty are not substitutes for this evidence.

Research questions

Read the program

Scientific context

What prior work establishes and which comparisons remain open.

Data and evidence

Source rights, point-in-time data, labels, and Canadian context.

Model and training

The proposed representation, training stages, and ablations.

Evaluation and results

Task-specific benchmarks and the initial synthetic experiment.

Evidence classes

Product boundary

Insights is a full underwriting. Signal monitors new evidence and includes change-driven reassessment. The research introduces no new paid product or standalone verification charge. Institutions retain credit decisions, borrower communication, and intervention. Research schemas are not additions to the public API. See the model card for intended use and limitations.